Tweaking the config is easy if you've figured out how to build and load your own kernel. In the past, I have often seen statements that EXT4 is better for gaming than XFS. The only case where XFS is slower is when creating/deleting a lot of small files. There won't be any noticeable difference. my oldest one a OCZ Agility3 60GB is. It supports all. All of these Linux. ZFS vs EXT4 vs BTRFS File Systems Perhaps these types of file systems are strange or unknown to you, normal, since they are used in the environment of servers, NAS and Linux systems in general. As a reminder, luks encrypted partition are not dependent on the used file system (ext3/ext4/etc. Hello everyone, The time has come again for me to reinstall arch once more. Linux 5. Regarding filesystems. It also wasn't formatted with -m finobt=1 which is a game-changer for XFS performance with small files and heavy metadata updates. And generally, files that arent compressible, wont be forcefully compressed. 2. 1 Overview of File Systems in Linux. Because of this, and because EXT4 seems to have better TRIM support, my habit is to make SSD boot/root drives EXT4, and non-root bulk data spinning-rust drives/arrays XFS. but for the shared servers with many users you might consider xfs for the parallel IO and number of files. Checksumming, along with copy-on-write, provides the key method of ensuring file system integrity after unexpected power loss. Agree, actually I have a bunch of freebsd for ZFS. There was a higher risk than upon disconnection or loss of power than some of the files are truncated. I have a raid 1 setup on dual 3. Btrfs和Ext4都是优秀的文件系统，但在选择时需要考虑您的具体需求和使用场景。. I suggest to give the arch wiki a read to get an overview what btrfs provides and where it’s limited in comparison to other solutions. Here are some key differences between them: XFS is a high-performance file system that Silicon Graphics originally developed. Looking at benchmarks however it seems to have poor. The 12,3 % reduction in compilation time with BtrFS is a nice improvement but pales compared to the 58,4 % reduction seen with Ext4 on the same hardware doing the same task. . Here are some key differences between them: XFS is a high-performance file system that Silicon Graphics originally developed. XFS. The main thing is to use latest Linux kernels to avoid old kernel Btrfs implementation. Btrfs is expected to offer better. XFS. Theodore Ts’o, a maintainer for Ext3 and later, Ext4, has stated that he sees Btrfs as a better way forward than continuing to rely on the ext* technology. With not having the time to conduct the usual kernel version vs. , a really large number of processes all writing to the filesystem at once). ext4 파일 시스템은 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5에서 사용 가능한 기본 ext3 파일 시스템의 확장된 버전입니다. Another point against btrfs is the insane amount of memory it uses. I understand if I use zfs/btrfs i will miss out on any data redundancy features but maybe pick up some added features like better consistency, snapshots, ect or should I just stick with ext4. This is fundamental in determining the file system’s capacity. So I did two rounds: the. The only realistic benchmark is the one done on a real application in real conditions. Btrfs and Ext4 are Linux file systems but are. It can hold up to 1 billion terabytes of data. Not only does both file systems feature a more robust data assurances then XFS (the mature fsck for Ext4 and checksums and data. File-systems tested on the NVMe SSD included Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and NTFS. OMV4 or OMV5. Rather then using BTRFS, I would use XFS and hope for the best, or using dm-integrity. . 가능. The reason that Ext4 is often recommended is that it is the most used and trusted filesystem out there on Linux today. For example, my virtualization server is currently hyper-v and I use ReFS instead of NTFS for features like bitrot protection, checksums, ect. EXT4 is functional and is considered more stable. Now, lot of development efforts are pushed to Btrfs development and most probably it will become next generation default FS for Linux, a successor of EXT4. It was later developed for Linux. All my systems (4) have been using BTRFS for some time now without any issues. Potential for data loss: While btrfs has features to protect against data loss, these features can be complex to configure and may not always work as intended, leading to the possibility of data loss. file-system comparison, here are some fresh benchmarks looking at the Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and. It has features that can scale better than ext4 and is even preferred over ZFS by some users. Ext4 specially without a journal and XFS are both extremely fast. Mar 14, 2012. Die Benchmark-Testergebnisse zeigten, dass BTRFS etwas niedrigere Lese- und Schreibgeschwindigkeiten als EXT4 hatte. A maximum. But btrfs is not by any stretch the default Linux file system. 2 See what others are saying What is btrfs? Btrfs, which stands for B-tree file system, is a modern and advanced file system that supports many features, such as snapshots, compression,. 7. XFS has a few features that ext4 has not like CoW but it can't be shrinked while ext4 can. In most cases that’s EXT4, but for Fedora, OpenSuse and maybe a few others it’s btrfs. Perhaps btrfs is much better for SSDs, but in oldschool HDDs I. I developed an application recently and compared the I/O performance of both and found ext4 to be slightly quicker for my application which was really just opening and reading whole files into memory. We may have lengthy talk on ext vs XFS vs f2fs and btrfs vs zfs and there are many more points to be mentioned, but for regular users. webbphillips • 8 mo. If you're on HDD and you need the ability to shrink the fs, then use EXT4, but you lose any COW benefits. XFS File System Support for large file sizes - The Ext4 supports a single file size of up to 16 TiB ( Tebibytes ) whereas XFS supports a max file size of up to 8 exbibytes. Note that while these tests are not indicative of real-world performance, we can extrapolate these results and use this as one reason. It is the default file system in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. With Bcachefs core development being done and the possibility of this file-system being mainlined soon, here are some fresh benchmarks of this file-system compared to Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and ZFS On Linux. 5. Allerdings hatte BTRFS eine deutlich bessere Leistung bei kleinen. BTRFS bietet, mal abgesehen von der Möglichkeit einer Inline Deduplizierung, beinahe alle Features von ZFS. The benchmark results of three most common file systems under Linux environment were given in this paper. If you have a NAS or Home server, BTRFS or XFS can offer benefits but then you'll have to do some extensive reading first. 4 To 4. both have hidden sharp edges, work differently, and have different design philosophies in terms of the command line tools etc. Ext4 (Extended File System) Btrfs ( B-tree File System) Lợi ích khi chạy File System Btrfs trên NAS Synology. It is a very good filesytem, it's just lacking a lot of "modern" features, like snapshots or subvolumes. It is the default file system in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. XFS is spectacularly fast during both the insertion phase and the workload execution. A continuación, os vamos a explicar brevemente las principales características de EXT4 y de Btrfs. EXT4 Vs XFS. Thanks again! Unless you're doing something crazy, ext4 or btrfs would both be fine. Usable space isn't a big issue but I don't want to lose half with RAID 10. What concerns me is reports that its heavier on ssd's due to all the extra metadata tracking etc. Both are suitable for everyday use, but it's worth noting that ext4 partitions. Seeking around those files which a DB will do may yield different. 14 stable and Linux 3. zfs or btrfs or ext4. It's rigid and inflexible. Btrfs, ZFS, and bcachefs are probably your best bets out of the 19 options considered. Mount ntfs drives only read only. The fourth generation File System of the Ext (Extended) file system family. XFS Storage : 2019-01-07: FreeBSD ZFS vs. Linux vs. By far, XFS can handle large data better than any other filesystem on this list and do it reliably too. 2. Quota journaling: This avoids the need for lengthy quota consistency checks after a crash. 1. Delay allocation. XFS, EXT4, and BTRFS are file systems commonly used in Linux-based operating systems. 对于一些文件系统如Ext4等，在硬盘格式化时就全部确定了，而对于XFS则是动态生成的，BtrfS则是更特别的动态实现。. Btrfs is a more modern file system, introduced in 2007. . . The NTFS support was powered by FUSE. How do the major file systems supported by Linux differ from each other?Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS were tested in their out-of-the-box state / default mount options. petronasAMG77 • 1 yr. BTRFS subvolumes and the way a distro like Opensuse handles it, by using subvolumes and snapshotting on upgrades, is really nice. A Seagate FireCuda 520 PCIe 4. A Red Hat training course is available for RHEL 8. The Btrfs partition scheme preset creates an ext4 /boot, and a Btrfs pool. You didn't provide the Linux distribution information, but assuming CentOS or Red Hat, XFS is now somewhat integrated. Each of these relies on the backing filesystem being configured correctly. It's stable and time-proven. However, Ext3 lacks advanced file system features like extent blocking mapping, dynamic allocation inode, and defragmentation. In the future, Linux distributions will gradually shift towards BtrFS. Linux 5. EXT4 still performs better than BTRFS. Ability to shrink filesystem. This is the number of data disks times the number of blocks per. Since btrfs does not work like a normal partition, but uses volumes and subvolumes per default on fedora, you may see other challenges. Both Btrfs and ZFS offer built-in RAID support, but their implementations differ. Running AIO-Stress on the Western Digital VelociRaptor was yielding speeds not technically possible for the Serial ATA 3. Btrfs (pronounced as Butter FS, Better FS, or B-Tree FS) Considering that the btrfs will be able for spanning over the multiple hard drives, it is a very good poit that it can support 16 times more drive space than the ext4. For these reasons, Fedora has made BTRFS the standard filesystem in their newer releases. Silent data corruption, sometimes referred to as bitrot, is more. 0 SSD drive used was a 250GB Samsung 850 PRO solid-state drive connected both via SATA. Btrfs' RAID on Linux 5. Bcachefs is the file-system born out of the Linux kernel's block cache code and has been worked on the past several years by. These days the system is more refined with Dalto’s Btrfs Assistant. In today's video, we will talk about the 4 Major Linux File Systems. It can store large files and has advanced features as compared to Ext2 and Ext3. We currently recommend XFS for production deployments. The XFS file system is loved in the Linux community for its ability to handle and manage significant. Also, on ZFS, in Linux, it takes some tweaking to get it performing good, so I would suggest to go btrfs or XFS. Sure, BtrFS has its benefits and novel features, but "has never once failed me in 10+ years" is an incredibly strong reliability trend that I'd be hesitant to trade for those, especially in a piece of my infrastructure where a single failure could potentially cause massive loss of data and subsequent time spent recovering from backups/etc. ran defragment utility to compress all existing files. Although both ext4 and XFS are excellent at what they do, neither are suited to some of today’s more complex storage challenges. Using Btrfs, just expanding a zip file and trying to immediately enter that new expanded folder in Nautilus, I am presented with a “busy” spinning graphic as Nautilus is preparing to display the new folder contents. 1. xfs command. XFS is about as mainline as a non-ext filesystem gets under Linux. Between EXT4 and XFS which file system is better when an application uses multiple threads to read/write large amount of small files on a SSD. As others have said, btrfs is newer and offers a few advanced features for backups (snapshots) and data integrity. That bug apart, any delayed allocation filesystem (ext4 and btrfs included) will lose a significant number or un-synched data in case of uncontrolled poweroff. I think in many ways btrfs is the better filesystem, but I seem to have noticed that it takes longer to copy data than on ext4. I am getting too many input/output errors with my 3TB HDD NTFS hard disk for main files. 7 - Btrfs vs. Neither of the filesystems is better supported by OMV4 or OMV5. The check task is involves reading roughly 2000 small files in their entirety and performing some processor intensive tasks on them. Each one might work for you based on YOUR needs! Supp. The PostgreSQL database server ran well particularly on EXT4 and XFS while F2FS on the USB 3. Starting with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. Btrfs stands for B Tree Filesystem, It is often pronounced as “better-FS” or “butter-FS. what i found is that ext3 lost around 5-10 files out of every million, XFS around 5-30 per million and both Reiser and JFS went to several hundreds, a thousand lost files in at least one case. OpenSUSE hiện sử dụng btrfs làm tùy chọn mặc định cho phân vùng /root, nơi đặt hệ điều hành. @taffer Your "recent benchmark" is from April 2015, over three years old and uses XFS with only default options. 7. " And it can be much faster than btrfs, especially with lots of smaller files. Same could be said of reads, but if you have a TON of memory in the server that's greatly mitigated and work well. ran btrfs balance to balance all btrfs volumes. Recommended for general use. The answer is zfs. provides. A maximum partition size of the btrfs file system is 16 exbibytes, as well as maximum file size is 16 exbibytes too. Ext4 vs ext3. BTRFS VS EXT4 performance in Raid 1. Under Compile Bench, EXT4 was the fastest on all three drives followed by a mix of XFS and F2FS. Ext4 focuses on providing a reliable and stable file system with good performance. There’s very little difference between EXT4 and XFS, both in total throughput and behavior over time. It is a copy-on-write (CoW) filesystem supporting. 또한 ext3. 5. Also, on ZFS, in Linux, it takes some tweaking to get it performing good, so I would suggest to go btrfs or XFS. Though personally I'd still go with ext4 primarily because despite recognizing some potential benefits of btrfs, I really don't see them as important for how I use my computers. On the NVMe SSD, the four-thread FS-Mark was the fastest on XFS followed by Btrfs. Does that mean that if I'm using btrfs snapshots, it will not save parity data for any snapshots other than the current state of the drive, that it will only save parity data for one snapshot other than the current state of the drive, or that it will fail entirely?ZFS can also send and receive file system snapshots, a process which allows users to optimize their disk space. EXT4 vs. Each file system has its own advantages and disadvantages. Phoronix: Linux 4. And the I discovered how many tools are out there to recover data from EXT partitions and how few for XFS. For BTRFS, the overall throughput is fairly low (~30k tps), while the jitter is somewhat better and worse than for EXT4/XFS at the same time. The XFS one on the other hand take around 11-13 hours!With Bcachefs on its trek towards the mainline Linux kernel, this week I conducted some benchmarks using the very latest Bcachefs file-system code and compared its performance to the mainline Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS file-system competitors on both rotating and solid-state storage. yield a very fast imaging backup. Con: rumor has it that it is slower than ext3, the fsync dataloss soap. As for why btrfs on root, well, it offers rollback on updates and. Ext4 is probably the final evolution of the ext filesystem (which started with ext, then ext2, ext3, and now ext4). XFS is a robust and mature 64-bit journaling file system that supports very large files and file systems on a single host. Installing and booting with BTRFS has its advantages too. EXT4 has entirely different design goals, none of which are data integrity. EXT4 is better for small files and day to day use. (For example, you might have an ext4 root filesystem, but store most of your data on a zfs or btrfs pool. FreeBSD has ports you can install that will allow data transfer of some linux file systems. (2013) compared the performance of Btrfs against XFS and ext4. In a significant data corruption, Ext2 and Ext3 file systems are more possible and easy to recover data due to their data redundancy compared with Ext4. On multi-drive systems, the opposite might be true, zfs outperforming ext4. use ZFS only w/ ECC RAM. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. FYI: btrfs. 1. A daily snapshot of Ubuntu 19. Example: Dropbox is hard-coded to use ext4, so will refuse to work on ZFS and BTRFS. EXT4 vs. Edit: I managed to save the two NTFS HDDs with chkdsk, but the exFAT drive just didn't wanna play ball. All have pros and cons. On the other hand, for Linux/Unix-based devices, it might be a bit of a challenge choosing one among many options. Increased Performance of ext4 vs. More uniquely, checksumming can detect errors in the data itself. But, as always, your specific use case affects this greatly, and there are corner cases where any of. ago. are two different decisions you have to make. Out of curiosity I have tried BTRFS (still unstable so I can't really expect to be able to use it) and noticed that the read speed is about 150% of ext4 - while write speed is comparable. •. – cas. It takes a second to snapshot, and deletes of a snapshotted tree what takes ext4 26 hours is a few minutes on btrfs. Btrfs vs Ext4. 0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. The thing is I'm putting /home in a separate HDD. Si su aplicación falla con números de inodo grandes, monte el sistema de archivos XFS con la opción -o inode32 para imponer números de inodo inferiores a 232. EXT4 es el sistema de archivos más utilizado en sistemas operativos basados en Linux, este sistema de. It was also 164% faster in post-snapshot reads and 17% faster in post-snapshot writes. Maybe adding Btrfs compression would be negligible outside of storage benchmarks. I used XFS until I managed to corrupt my partition table (my fault not XFS'). Each of the five file-systems were tested on the same NVM Express SSD from the Linux 4. Use XFS for your array drives and Btrfs for your cache pool. Partition Size: Ext4 supports partition size up to 1 EiB, while Btrfs supports partition size up to 16 EiB. For personal and SOHO use, EXT4 is the most commonly used file system in Linux systems. El ext4 y xf. Btrfs was 107% faster in initial read scores and 24% faster in initial write scores. 3. XFS is very well established and changing slowly, and the same can be said for EXT4. BTRFS. 而如果您注重稳定性和广泛的支持，Ext4可能更适合您。. 500GB HDD formatted as NTFS for luks containers. btrfs seems to write more data to a disk than ext4. Btrfs is not a successor to the default Ext4 file system used in most Linux distributions, but it can be expected to replace Ext4 in the future. The XFS one on the other hand take around 11-13 hours!With Bcachefs on its trek towards the mainline Linux kernel, this week I conducted some benchmarks using the very latest Bcachefs file-system code and compared its performance to the mainline Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS file-system competitors on both rotating and solid-state storage. I think in many ways btrfs is the better filesystem, but I seem to have noticed that it takes longer to copy data than on ext4. In the end I use ext4 as trustworthy frontend, and btrfs as a unreliable backup. However, when we review EXT4 vs BTRFS, here’s the downside: BTRFS has disk and volume management built-in, while EXT4 is a “pure filesystem”. I've compiled in tmpfs for over a decade now. 3. Same as with ZFS. I don't know anything about XFS (I thought unRaid was entirely btrfs before this thread) ZFS is pretty reliable and very mature. Just so perfect to roll back for some games and modding. Checksumming, along with copy-on-write, provides the key method of ensuring file system integrity after unexpected power loss. So now I can boot up into a snapshot. The XFS File System. XFS vs. On lower thread counts, it’s as much as 50% faster than EXT4. Most distros continue to default to ext4. If you wish to run ext4, xfs or btrfs then you need to run a linux OS not BSD. You might also want to consider Btrfs for your array drives, but you should be aware of the potential risks. File-systems tested on the NVMe SSD included Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and NTFS. Is XFS better than btrfs? September 30, 2023 by Garry. Vide. EXT4 being the “safer” choice of the two, it is by the most commonly used FS in linux based systems, and most applications are developed and tested on EXT4. Table of Contents. Probably those edge cases are not visible on an external USB hard drive, could be visible with external SSDs on a USB3. . I know the latest versions do not setup /home in a separate partition anymore but as a btrfs subvolume instead. Btrfs, EXT4, XFS, F2FS, and NILFS2 were tested on a Linux 5. Edit: I managed to save the two NTFS HDDs with chkdsk, but the exFAT drive just didn't wanna play ball. 创建 btrfs 文件系统 6. Page 2 of 2. Each of the five file-systems were tested on the same NVM Express SSD from the Linux 4. The Ext4 File System. Each of the tested file-systems were carried out with the default mount options in an out-of-the-box manner. 8. • 3 mo. Ext4 has some scalability and performance issues when dealing with large or fragmented files or directories. If you use Debian, Ubuntu, or Fedora Workstation, the installer defaults to ext4. /boot/efi has to be FAT32 (assuming you are using it as the ESP and not just adding partitions extra partitions under /boot to test how robust the boot sequence is). Pro: supported by all distro's, commercial and not, and based on ext3, so it's widely tested, stable and proven. A number of Phoronix readers have been asking about some fresh file-system comparisons on recent kernels. #filesystem #ext4 #xfs #linuxExplicación de las diferencias entre sistemas de archivos, en este vídeo se comparan los 2 mas usados en GNU/Linux. The stock mount options were used for all of the testing. This is an issue for those like me who have older laptops e. Between 2T and 4T on a single disk, any of these would probably have similar performance. XFS and ext4 now calculate a checksum on metadata and their journal files. . SUSE Linux Enterprise Server ships with different file systems from which to choose, including Btrfs, Ext4, Ext3, Ext2 and XFS. XFS. If you're looking to warehouse big blobs of data or lots of archive and reporting; then by all means ZFS is a great choice. ext4. It provides an unlimited subdirectory. BTRFS VS EXT4 performance in Raid 1. Improve this answer. Linux File System Comparison: XFS vs. 0 SSD drive used was a 250GB Samsung 850 PRO solid-state drive connected both via SATA and then a SATA. Multimedia Sanctuaries: With large files as daily bread, ext4 is indispensable. Utilice. But I would still refrain from using it on the deck due to the case folding trouble. There won't be any noticeable difference. Both cases, a mechanical drive. The total throughput is better than with ZFS (40k vs 60k), but the jitter is more severe. Small to Medium Enterprises: While ext3 suffices for businesses with modest data needs, scalability visionaries would do well considering ext4. 1 million iops for ext4, right in line with the spec of the drive times 2,. Built By the Slant team. File Size: Ext4 supports file size up to 16 TiB, while Btrfs. installs, natively. file-system comparison, here are some fresh benchmarks looking at the Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS file-system benchmarks on a speedy WD_BLACK SN850 NVMe solid-state drive. Regarding boot drives : Use enterprise grade SSDs, do not use low budget commercial grade equipment. Btrfs es mucho más rápido de lo que crees basándote en esos benchmarks, ya que no se ajustan a tu caso de uso. But I was more talking to the XFS vs EXT4 comparison. Hi I have used BTRFS for the first time since March 2023 on my internal archives directory. So với Ext4, Btrfs hoạt động ổn đinh hơn, dễ dàng quản lý hơn và tích hợp nhiều ứng dụng hỗ trợ tốt cho doanh nghiệp Quy mô lớn. Four years later, Rodeh et al. That is according to my quick read of various Phoronix tests. A tool for managing BTRFS and LVM snapshots. It lived enough, time to move on. My home file share runs zol because I prefer zfs to btrfs and run it at work a lot so I'm much more comfortable with it. Personally I run btrfs on all my Linux devices, some of them with half-decade old installations of Arch and they've all performed admirably. Btrfs is the recommended file system to use in most scenarios. XFS on the other hand is older, so more "mature. Xfs is very opinionated as filesystems go. I'd say ext, because it is faster, and because you asking means, that you don't know how to use btrfs features, otherwise the choice is obvious: need snapshots -> btrfs, need reflinks -> XFS, default -> ext4. Now I may send the snapshots also to an local device (formatted in Btrfs). It also recovers from power failure easily, with the journaling system. A. What takes up space is each consecutive data change, that is why snapshots are created instantaneously. Subvolumes do not have a size, so the Desired. For the adventurous: you can define block devices on btrfs and use ext4 on those block devices (ext4 on btrfs). Features of the XFS and ZFS. Rationale is native Linux nature, vs xfs being Linux supported. Key Btrfs features Perhaps the most important feature is the checksumming of all data. Here are a few other differences: Features: Btrfs has more advanced features, such as snapshots, data integrity checks, and built-in RAID support. - Linux Kernel 5. Sun Microsystems originally created it as part of its Solaris operating system. 15 kernel can see our dozens of articles covering this. Let’s go through the different features of the two filesystems. Pros: Individual file size: 16GB to 2TB. It has been tried and tested, it is no doubt a solid and stable filesystem. Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS were tested in their out-of-the-box state / default mount options. We believe that btrfs has the correct feature set and roadmap to serve Ceph in the long-term, but XFS and ext4. Btrfs provides checksums for data and metadata, ensuring enhanced data integrity. 2. For a future article will be a look at non-mainlined file-systems,. Regarding boot drives : Use enterprise grade SSDs, do not use low budget commercial grade equipment. because it spans multiple partitions, it's less likely to fill up your hard drive. Interestingly, the first version of the Ext4 filesystem, the Extended filesystem (“Ext”), came out in 1992 for the Minix OS. I haven't benchmarked the performance but as a user on a modern desktop/laptop system with fast ssd, f2fs vs btrfs didn't show any. I converted my ext4 disks (3 x ssd + 1 x hdd) to btrfs, and all was well. Though EXT4 has few strong capabilities, it is reliable and well-maintained across all Linux operating systems. Each one might work for you based on YOUR needs! Supp. btrfs 当然值得尝试、但要在桌面 Linux 上完全取代 ext4 可能还需要一些时间。. Btrfs has been a stable part of the Linux kernel since 2013, and you can reformat your hard drives using the file system today. While looking at the filesystem options it seems like BTRFS is a lot more stable than it was the last time I had to install arch so now I am seriously considering using it. Overview of File Systems in Linux. The btrfs and zfs storage drivers allow for advanced options, such as creating "snapshots", but require more maintenance and setup. Its primary developer, Kent Overstreet, first announced it in 2015, and it will be added to the Linux kernel beginning with 6. It you have huge hard drives, BTRFS supports up to 16 times larger size than 1 EXT4 partition. Ability to create large volumes of up to 1 PB 1. It would be interesting to see a new benchmark result of CoW filesystems BTRFS vs ZFS in real world 2022. But. 4. Phoronix: Linux 4. 3TB HDD formatted as NTFS for main files. both are great choices, but for me the more generally useful choice is BTRFS. Được tích hợp vô hệ thống DSM Synology , do NAS có hiệu xuất làm việc cao trong vấn đề lưu trữ và khôi phục, Btrfs hoạt động trên NAS. Yes Ext4 is much easier to setup but BTRFS has its advantages.